The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark search twitter facebook feed linkedin instagram google-plus avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close
Skip to main content

The U.S. Department of Justice recently reported that Portland police officers “use more force than necessary” when dealing with the mentally ill. More specifically, “[P]olice used Tasers in situations where use of a stun gun ‘is not justified’ or fire Tasers repeatedly when only a single shot is justified,” The Oregonian wrote in its bullet-pointed breakdown of the 42-page document.

Now, the DOJ is investigating six Saginaw, MI, police officers who shot a mentally ill man 46 times in July, according to Last month, Anderson Cooper aired an onlooker’s video of the shooting, in which the viewer is able to hear at least 30 rounds.

Police arrived on the scene when 49-year-old Milton Hall allegedly had an altercation with a convenience store clerk. Officers told Hall to put his knife down. He refused and told them to sic the K-9 on him. Without provocation, the officers opened fire.

As one CNN commenter wrote, “The man was walking backwards! You would have thought a wild elephant was charging them with the force they used! It's plain as day that these cops overreacted and I would not want them serving and ‘PROTECTING’ in my city!! They need to see some prison time, this is ridiculous…”

Veteran Long Island police officer Lou Palumbo agreed. "This wasn't a scenario where he was discharging a weapon in their direction," he said.

Many of the 4,011 comments ask why police didn’t just taze Hall.

Palumbo suggests the officers need better training.

What do you think?


  1. Gravatar for Harold A Maio

    The U.S. Department of Justice recently reported that Portland police officers “use more force than necessary” when dealing with --the-- mentally ill.

    "The" mentally ill has become almost as important as once "the" Blacks was. Why is difficult to explain.

  2. Gravatar for Miranda S. Miller
    Miranda S. Miller

    Hi, Mr. Maio!

    Thank you for reading and commenting. I hope "the mentally ill" doesn't offend you. I see it as a group of people such as "the" Cleveland Browns.

    Also, "mentally" is an adverb and "ill" is typically an adjective. So if I wrote "when dealing with mentally ill," I'd lack a noun/direct object. If you google "ill definition," the first result says:



    Not in full health; sick: "seriously ill".


    Badly, wrongly, or imperfectly: "ill-chosen".


    People who are ill: "the mentally ill".

    This is perhaps why "The National Alliance on Mental Illness (also known as NAMI) was founded in 1979 as the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill," according to Wikipedia.

    The Juneau Alliance for Mental Health still refers to folks as the mentally ill:

    - Reduce bias and stigma toward the mentally ill through public education

    - Promote programs, policies, and practices which treat the mentally ill with respect & dignity

    So, again, no offense intended. I think it's just a grammatical issue.

Comments are closed.

Of Interest