11222017Headline:

Cleveland, Ohio

HomeOhioCleveland

Email William B. Eadie William B. Eadie on LinkedIn William B. Eadie on Twitter William B. Eadie on Facebook William B. Eadie on Avvo
William B. Eadie
William B. Eadie
Attorney • (866) 735-1102 Ext 672

Party of Zero Responsibility?

2 comments

House Republicans have passed malpractice entitlements—caps on damages that allow the one group of people to be “untouchable” and unaccountable for their actions beyond a base amount. That amount—which includes pain, suffering, emotional trauma, and punitive damages meant to punish particularly egregious behavior—is $250,000.

Sound like a lot of money? What is your leg worth? Your eyesight? Your life? Would you let someone cut off both your legs for $250,000?

Of course not.

The question that should bother you is, “if this is only allowing people who hurt other people and are legally responsible for that harm to avoid responsibility, why would 223 Republicans in Congress vote for it? Why is the ‘bad doctor’ lobby so strong in a party that claims to be the party of responsibility?” Great question.

As Deep Throat supposedly said to Bob Woodward while Bob was researching the Watergate story (soon to be scandal), “Follow the Money.”

The real winners from tort reform—which gives doctors an entitlement to commit malpractice—is the insurance lobby. The insurance lobby that reaps hefty profits, and whose main tactic isn’t to reduce medical mistakes (which works!), but to tell the injured people “tough luck.”

Go figure.

Study after study shows that many Americans are injured or even killed by avoidable mistakes, and that simple solutions exist to change that. Worse yet, most hospital errors go unreported.

Oh, so where’s that money? Going to your Republican leadership’s pockets (and a few Democrats as well!).

P.S., for anyone who thinks tort reform is about protecting doctors from frivolous lawsuits, you’ve been misled (remember, damages caps don’t even apply until a jury of YOU—the public—passes judgment against a doctor). Denying your fellow Americans their constitutional right to the civil justice system won’t reduce healthcare costs, either.

Prior articles on malpractice entitlements:

Why Tort Reform Won’t Reduce Healthcare Costs

Irony-Deaf AMA Supports Trial Lawyers . . . For Doctors Only

Insurance Companies Fighting to Survive Frivolous-Lawsuit Onslaught

Real Medical Malpractice Reform in New York—It’s About Patient Safety, Stupid.

Oklahoma Republicans Show True Colors: Anti-Justice Business Tools

Malpractice Entitlements on the Way

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. Seth says:
    up arrow

    So why are doctors leaving states with high malpractice rates?

  2. up arrow

    Seth, you’ll find that statistics do not back up the assertion that there is a “doctor epidemic.” See, e.g, the Ohio rates–physician counts go up every year. e.g., http://www.med.ohio.gov/board-statistics.htm (showing increasing numbers of licensed physicians year-by-year).

    As one commenter related, “if doctors are fleeing every state, where are they going?” This argument is a ruse to scare people into thinking they won’t be able to get medical care if we hold physicians accountable for their actions.